Newsletter (20 November 2003)

Euro-MP calls for ban on new TETRA mast

this may be of interest to you, as campaigners against TETRA. Please feel free to distribute among your networks.

very best wishes

Paul Steedman, Assistant to Caroline Lucas, Green Party MEP for South East England


From the office of the Green MEPs (excerpt)

18 November, 2003


SOUTH-East England's Green Euro-MP Caroline Lucas has called for a region-wide moratorium on building a network of 'TETRA' phone masts until questions over the safety of their radiation emissions have been answered.

Dr Lucas has today called on local authorities across the South East to follow the lead of Arun District Council in West Sussex, which has halted the installation of TETRA masts pending further investigation into the health risks. "Many people are deeply concerned about the health effects of the radiation emitted by TETRA masts," said Dr Lucas. "These fears have been heightened by the fact that users of TETRA handsets have reported suffering migraine, burning sensations, sleeplessness, and a lack of concentration. "People's real concerns about the masts supplying these handsets must be allayed before further masts are built, not after another public health scare erupts."

Dr Gerard Hyland, a Warwick university physicist, has pointed out that only the heating effect of radiation from TETRA has been investigated. He has proposed that this radiation pulses at frequencies that may affect the operation of the human body and should be taken into account.

Dr Lucas said: "The trials and the scientists' warnings have concentrated on the handsets rather than the TETRA masts, but they raise serious questions over the safety of the system as a whole. "Clearly far more investigation is needed before we commit ourselves, and our children, to exposure from these masts by allowing them to be built across the region, especially in residential areas and near schools, hospitals and offices. "The precautionary principle places the onus on TETRA's advocates to demonstrate the radiation emitted from the masts is safe before they are built, not after the ill-effects are being felt."


For more information please contact Ben Duncan on 020 7407 6280, 07973823358 or

Ben Duncan

Green MEPs' Press Officer, Suite 58, The Hop Exchange, 24 Southwark Street, London SE1 1TY, 020 7407 6280 (tel), 020 7234 0183 (fax),

Paul Steedman Assistant and South East Co-ordinator for Caroline Lucas MEP Suite 58, The Hop Exchange 24 Southwark Street London SE1 1TY Tel: 020 7407 6281 Fax: 020 7234 0183 For more information please visit Caroline's website at


Health statement about Dr Miguel Muntané and his family

Dear Klaus

I send you the health information about our family.

Best regards


----- Original Message -----

From: Imelda O'Connor


Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 3:58 AM

Subject: Re: Query regards your health



--- wrote:

Dear Imelda O'Connor

The translation in correct.

I suffer form epilepsy since the operator increased the power in January 2001, without any information. (Surprising in December 2000 I did a TV program with 10 hours emission about microwave form base stations and mobile phones)

a. We leaved our house immediately.

I have cancer control form 1999, and the base station (5 meters from our house with direct radiation) is operating since 1996.

In Luxembourg I started the conference with this health description but the indifference of WHO and Dr. Repacholi is rigorous.

I do not care about microwave hearing, that is very high near base stations. One of my sons has destruction of stress hormone (Addison disease).

That is the reason I inform about microwaves.

And you are doing a very good work

Best regards


----- Original Message -----

From: Imelda O'Connor


Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 5:51 AM

Subject: Query regards your health

My question: is this an error/inaccuracy caused by translation from Spanish to English or have you really developed cancer and epilepsy from RF exposure?

Regards, Imelda,  Cork.


Swiss Re informed all the insurance companies to skip all liabilities regarding EMR

Dear all,

As far as insurance is concerned Swiss Re has informed all the insurance companies, that they have to skip all liabilities regarding EMR in their contracts. AXA e.g. did so!!!

Jack Justus

Stichting Electro_Smog

The Netherlands


Re: Comments on Iris Atzmon's Wi-Fi message

It's worth mentioning that the separation between thermal and a-thermal is not really accurate, or as Robert Kane calls it- it's red herring because there is absorption of energy anyway- and the water reacts whether it's food or human being.

----- Original Message -----

From: Don Maisch

Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2003 11:54 PM

Subject: Comments on Iris Atzmon's Wi-Fi message

To All

Comments on Iris Atzmon's Wi-Fi message

From my understanding the maximum absorption (penetration) occurs at around 750 to 915 Mhz. So that the GSM mobile phone frequency range would have been a better frequency for microwave ovens than the 1250 Mhz one originally chosen.

2450 Mhz would be even less efficient for a microwave oven as at that frequency the energy is deposited mostly near the surface. - So a comparison with Wi'Fi and microwave ovens is not appropriate as heating is not the issue -  what IS the issue are non-thermal effects, one of which is the electric field interaction with skin, showing up as skin rashes. This is what should be looked for in schools with WLANS.

Don Maisch


RE: Comments on Iris Atzmon's Wi-Fi message

I believe the thermal / non-thermal distinction is essential, though it should be called 'thermal' vs 'informational'. The life effects being seen are due to electromagnetic (electrical and magnetic) fields interfering with living cells and living beings internal natural bio-electric communications used to determine what the various cells in our bodies should be doing at any time. It is not an issue of power and or heating, but of signalling.

You can get signalling information from underneath noise if the signalling (pulsing) is regularly repeated. That is how we got pictures from satellites on the fringe of our solar system. The power received on Earth was 'sub-microscopic' and below the noise floor.

The human eye and the human ear in a healthy human, especially a child, are so sensitive that they can detect 1 photon/quanta - and normal power-based noise theory says that they should need to be at near absolute zero temperature (about - 273 deg C) - when, in fact they are at body temperature. Their operation defies the power sensitivity approach.

A new type of cells have recently been found in the human eye (not rods or cones) that signal the presence of light to the pineal gland (Russell Foster). They may also be sensitive to EMFs - they haven't been tested yet.

Alasdair Philips


Correction is needed in one article on "Wi-Fi"

Dear Klaus,

I'm very much appreciated to the ML "Bi-Omega". Your ML is very useful to protect our lives.

Unfortunately, I found a serious mistake on the property of microwaves. In the article about "Wi-Fi", one stated that " The same frequency of Wi- Fi - 2.45 GHz -  is the one that was chosen not accidently to the microwave ovens. Why - because in this frequency, the water absorbs electromagnetic energy in maximum speed, and that enables the food that contains water, to heat rapidly. "

This statement is completely wrong!!!! This is a incorrect claim that often stated by persons for mobile phone industry saying that "mobile phone is safe because the frequency of which is not 2.45GHz". One can remember that the frequency of microoven in U. S. is sometimes 0.9GHz. The frequency of microwave that is absorbed by water at a maximum rate is not 2.45GHz but around 10GHz. You can ask specialists (microoven makers etc.) for this point.

Since we wish you to keep a quality of the article, not to be attacked by persons for industries, please correct incorrect statement as quickly as possible, to save you ML and our lives.


a reader


Petition about DEW

Dear Omega-team and list members,

On the 14th of November, the division of Deputy activities of the European Parliament has acknowledged receipt and registered the petition about the "danger of abuse of Directed Energy Weapons" (English = which had been posted on this list.

117 people mainly from France, Germany, Great Britain and a few other countries have signed it. Now it has to be examined by the "Petition Commission", which can take a fair amount of time says the letter. If more people would wish to join and sign it, the signatures could be collected the same way it has been done and regularly forwarded to the EP.

Many thanks to those who have participated and signed or forwarded the text. This issue has to be acknowledged and the petition could contribute to it thanks to your participation.

Best regards

Nathalie Luthold


Next to the Stanford Research International

Dear Klaus.

Once again thanks for you respond.

As my wife Klaudia and I may read your - e-magazine, we notice that majority of the people do have knowledge of electro magnetic and related to it aspects. As I wrote to you once before, my family and I are reside in Palo Alto CA US, right next to the Stanford Research International. Consequently, my family was chosen and forcefully subjected to became Human Guinea Pigs in classified medical research conducted by the Government of USA. During routine operations while being under the general anaesthesia, doctors implanted plantation of microchips into the heads of the member of the Kats family. One of the main courses of studies is exploring program-involving studies of human eyes. Most of the chipsets implanted into our sculls are perfectly visible on X-ray but surgical removal will involve loss of vision, vegetation of death. Some details of this draconian experiment could be review in our site:

My question to the visitors of your site is:

How possibly we can protect ourselves to eliminate interception of transmitted in our heads waves?

Perhaps somebody know what type of waves is being transmitted and on what type of frequencies our body is function on?

Is it existing anything that could dysfunction chip implanted into the human body without surgical involvements and anyhow effecting environments of the human body?

Please help us to provide information in regards of our questions.

Sincerely. Edward Kats.


Nanotubes Highly Toxic