ZEIT ONLINE - Hamburg, Germany

Sie fürchtet sich vor Elektrosmog. Am liebsten würde sie die Strommasten unter der Erde verschwinden sehen. "Die Belastungen von Mensch und Umwelt müssen so ...

http://www.zeit.de/wirtschaft/2009-12/stromnetz-ausbau



http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Elektrosmog
http://omega.twoday.net/topics/Power+Lines/

Ovum - London, England, UK

Jeremy Green

A referendum triggered by a new environmental protection law may result in the principality becoming the first country in the world to reject the benefits of mobile communications in favour of tighter protection against electromagnetic radiation.

Liechtenstein's proposed new limits are ten times stricter than the existing regulations

One of Europe's smallest sovereign states might be about to become the first country in the world to turn its back on mobile communications, depending on the results of a referendum to be held this week.

Read More...
http://www.ovum.com/news/euronews.asp?id=8293



http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=electromagnetic+radiation
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=BioInitiative

Exposing WHO's risk analysis process for declaring a pandemic: Who profits?

December 1, 2009 at 10:50 pm

Back in June of this year the World Health Organisation (WHO), acting on the expert advice of its supposedly independent influenza advisers, declared the H1N1 Swine Flu as a world pandemic that activated a number of processes to combat the disease, obstentially to protect the world's population against the potentially deadly disease. Essentially the WHO influenza advisers conducted a risk assessment (risk analysis) which led to their recommendation to enact the pandemic classification.

Unfortunately, as with the case of the WHO risk analysis for power frequency hazards ( http://www.emfacts.com/papers/who_conflict.pdf ), again it is industry hacks who have the final say in direct violation of WHO conflict of interest policy.

Michael Repacholi, who founded both ICNIRP and the WHO's International EMF Project (IEMFP) stated in an Australian Senate inquiry in 2001 that the WHO had a firm policy against industry involvement in its processes. To quote:

"The World Health Organization does not allow industry to participate in either standard setting or in health risk assessment. The WHO takes the view that there cannot be industry representation on standard setting working groups. There cannot be someone on the working group who is having an influence on health effects for an industry when they derive benefit from that industry."

For the WHO, having a policy is one thing, following it is another thing entirely it seems.


Don Maisch

Source: http://www.emfacts.com/weblog/?p=1203

--------

WHO: Chan's Confession

OMS: "La Confesión de Chan" por Sergio Sargentini

WHO: Das Geständnis von Chan

http://www.next-up.org/Newsoftheworld/WHO_OMS.php#1



More about the theme:

http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=health+effect
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/search?q=World+Health+Organisation
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=World+Health+Organisation
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Repacholi
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=ICNIRP
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=EMF+Project
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=IEMFP

Food Consumer - Lisle, IL, USA

... based on your distance to a cell phone base station (cell phone tower). ... Essentially, the FCC is a mortgage holder for the mobile phone industry! ...

http://www.foodconsumer.org/newsite/Non-food/Environment/cell_phone_death_trap_311220091236.html

http://groups.google.com/group/electromagnetic_radiation_victims/t/efb56a63dc70bad2

From: laxmi <laxminow@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:48 AM